Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jennifer Brady vs Jamie Loeb Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Brady vs Loeb analysis and find out who is favored!
Jennifer Brady vs Jamie Loeb Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Brady 2 - 2 Loeb
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Brady has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Loeb has won 47.84%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Brady, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Loeb has won 53.9%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 39.2% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Brady has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Loeb has saved 55.29% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Brady has won 50% of matches played (W/L 6/ 6), with Loeb winning 47.37% (W/L 27/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Brady has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 187/ 109), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 13/ 13). Loeb has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 33/ 22), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 8/ 16).
- Player level: In the last year, Brady has played most of their matches on the Masters series, winning 40% of matches (W/L 2/ 3), where as Loeb has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 48.15% of matches (W/L 26/ 28). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Brady winning 2 times and Loeb being victorious 2 times. They have played 10 sets in total, with Brady winning 6 and Loeb winning 4. The last match between Brady and Loeb was at the Midland, 03-02-2018, Semifinals, I.hard with Jamie Loeb getting the victory 7-5 4-6 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:27:45.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Brady and Loeb have played a deciding set 2 times, with Brady winning 0 times and Loeb 2 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Brady winning 1, and Loeb 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Brady has played against opponents with an average rank of 204.75 while Loeb has played against players with an average rank of 303.6.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Brady has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Loeb has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Brady has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Loeb has converted 46.03% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
225
Rank
13
High
29
Age
R
Plays
2
Total2
1
Hard1
1
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
304
Rank
132
High
29
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
60% (255-173)
Career Total W/L
55% (295-246)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
54% (15-13)
$4,162,215
Career Prize Money
$219,866
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jennifer Brady | Jamie Loeb |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 6 | 4 |
| Games Won | 53 | 46 |
| Aces (Total) | 9 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:27:45 | 0:27:45 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (56/95) | 62% (58/94) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 63% (35/56) | 67% (39/58) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 67% (26/39) | 61% (22/36) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (3/8) | 44% (4/9) |
| Return Points W% | 35% (33/94) | 36% (34/95) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (2/4) | 50% (2/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (3/2) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (3/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 33% (3/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 4-6 6-4 |
Stats 
Jamie Loeb
Player
Jennifer Brady
62%
(
58 of
94)
1st Serve %
59%
(
56 of
95)
4
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
33 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
34 of
95)
95
Total Points Won
94
|
||||
| 6-7(7) 6-4 6-2 | |||||
| 7-5 6-3 | |||||
| 6-2 6-1 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jennifer Brady | Jamie Loeb |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 54% (15/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 55% (37/30) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 53% (323/288) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 73% (8/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (6/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 20% (1/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.28 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 82 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.35 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 105 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:45:53 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 301.46 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 55% (1054/1917) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 66% (700/1054) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 48% (416/862) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 45% (111/245) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 45% (902/2009) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 54% (15/13) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 56% (15/27) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 43% (3/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (4/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 81% (16/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 19% (16/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 17% (12/2) |
Jennifer Brady Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Magda Linette
Player
Jennifer Brady
64%
(
7 of
11)
1st Serve %
50%
(
7 of
14)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
6 of
7)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
15
Total Points Won
10
|
3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jennifer Brady
Player
Peyton Stearns
49%
(
23 of
47)
1st Serve %
50%
(
29 of
58)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
61%
(
14 of
23)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
79%
(
19 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Caroline Wozniacki
Player
Jennifer Brady
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jennifer Brady
Player
Magda Linette
54%
(
53 of
99)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
48%
(
22 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
44%
(
44 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
6-1 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jennifer Brady
Player
Kimberly Birrell
56%
(
45 of
81)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
36 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Donna Vekic
Player
Jennifer Brady
50%
(
42 of
84)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
81)
3
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
7
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
87
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elena Rybakina
Player
Jennifer Brady
58%
(
63 of
109)
1st Serve %
54%
(
61 of
113)
12
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
52%
(
24 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
37 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
44 of
113)
116
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(3) 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jennifer Brady
Player
Jelena Ostapenko
58%
(
72 of
125)
1st Serve %
59%
(
66 of
112)
7
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
10
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
51 of
66)
42%
(
22 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
44%
(
55 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
41 of
112)
111
Total Points Won
126
|
7-6(7) 0-6 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Madison Keys
Player
Jennifer Brady
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jennifer Brady
Player
Anhelina Kalinina
53%
(
20 of
38)
1st Serve %
48%
(
28 of
58)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
13 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Jamie Loeb Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasia Kulikova
Player
Jamie Loeb
59%
(
57 of
96)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
8
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
9
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ashton Bowers
Player
Jamie Loeb
53%
(
57 of
108)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
94)
3
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
7
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
41%
(
21 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
44%
(
48 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
94)
105
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Iva Jovic
Player
Jamie Loeb
56%
(
54 of
97)
1st Serve %
50%
(
50 of
100)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
9
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
42 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
100)
102
Total Points Won
95
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Iva Jovic
Player
Jamie Loeb
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Ana Sofia Sanchez
46%
(
23 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
46%
(
23 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
62
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ashton Bowers
Player
Jamie Loeb
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
50%
(
45 of
90)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
49%
(
35 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
90)
79
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-3 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Sophie Chang
51%
(
40 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
1
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
7
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
72%
(
28 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
25 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Katrina Scott
Player
Jamie Loeb
57%
(
56 of
98)
1st Serve %
62%
(
69 of
112)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
43 of
69)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
112)
106
Total Points Won
104
|
7-6(9) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Akasha Urhobo
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
68%
(
56 of
82)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
32%
(
10 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
36 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
84
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Adriana Reami
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Brady Vs Loeb Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
